To be truly effective, water management should be conducted considering the basin as a whole. Changes made in one part of the system will have huge impacts on the immediate upstream and downstream areas, but effects will be felt basin-wide. However, it is so often the case, and Lake Chad is no exception, that a river basin is divided amongst different authorities and management decisions are not made holistically.
In an effort to tackle this and
make water management decisions for Lake Chad on a regional scale, the Lake Chad Basin Commission (LCBC) was formed in
1964, joining together the states of Nigeria, Niger, Cameroon, and Chad (and
more recently the Central Africa Republic and Libya). Many of their past and
ongoing projects have a broad focus on strengthening the resilience of the
basin system but at the core of their activities is the aim to increase socio-economic
security and reduce conflict for the 38 million who live in the basin. However,
the LCBC is not recognised as a Regional Economic Community by the African
Union and is restricted by other complex institutional frameworks, meaning its
political and economic investment is limited.
Therefore, a number of global
organisations have collaborated on projects to protect Lake Chad. The World Bank,
the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), the
Cooperation in International Waters in Africa (CIWA) program, and a number of
other international partners workshopped with the LCBC in 2017 with a view to
run a programme to consolidate and improve knowledge of the hydrological system
of Lake Chad and the dynamics of water resources. This led to the development
of an updated model for groundwater dynamics in the basin, a remote sensing initiative
and the creation of the Lake Chad Flood and Drought Monitor, an interface that
allows users to see hydrological predictions for the area. The knowledge accumulated
by the project was intended to better inform stakeholders and decision-makers
of the dynamics of the lake and the basin.
While this all sounds great and
definitely has made improvements in terms of monitoring the lake and
progressing understanding of the basin system, it takes a very top-down
management approach. The Lake Chad Flood and Drought Monitor is not public
domain and an increasing reliance on remote sensing means that monitoring
knowledge is restricted to those specialised in sensing software. It also does not stand to address the issue I
started this post with: the holistic and regional management of Lake Chad’s resources.
If utilised properly and given the proper political framework to hold its member
states accountable for the collaborative and sustainable management of the lake,
it could be a positive force to help adapt to the environmental changes the
lake is experiencing.
Until next time!
Hi Briony
ReplyDeleteI was just looking at some critics of the LCBC that have claimed that the LCBC have caused communities living on the banks of the basin to have supply chains broken through vehicular bans and boat movement restrictions.
Do you think the defence of the hydrological and ecological system should be placed higher than the socio-economic development of the societies living on the basin?
Sorry for dropping by with a very large question, ha.
Tim
Hi Tim,
DeleteGreat question. I think the two are extremely entangled but ultimately it's a weighing of the severity of the impacts in either case. I think that there's an opportunity for governments to step in and provide alternative supply routes and mitigate any impacts on socio-economic developments. I don't think there as many options when it comes to trying to protect the lake and therefore I supposed I would place it above the socio-economic development of the population of the basin (although ultimately they go hand in hand).